Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education
Abstract The aim of this project was to understand student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence (GAI) technologies such as Chat generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), in order to inform changes to the University of Liverpool Academic Integrity code of practice. The survey for this study was created by a library student team and vetted through focus groups. A total of 2555 students participated in the survey. Results showed that only 7% of students who responded had not heard
Record details
Published: 8 February 2024
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Understanding students’ adoption of the ChatGPT chatbot in higher education: the role of anthropomorphism, trust, design novelty and institutional policy
OpenAlex · 16 February 2024
Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students
OpenAlex · 16 February 2024
How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative Artificial Intelligence? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey
OpenAlex · 26 January 2024
A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 23 January 2024
When artificial intelligence substitutes humans in higher education: the cost of loneliness, student success, and retention
OpenAlex · 13 March 2024
Incorporating AI in foreign language education: An investigation into ChatGPT’s effect on foreign language learners
OpenAlex · 19 March 2024
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (8 February 2024), “Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education,” evidence record 9534, https://ethics.ai/record/9534 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.