The application of large language models in medicine: A scoping review
This study systematically reviewed the application of large language models (LLMs) in medicine, analyzing 550 selected studies from a vast literature search. LLMs like ChatGPT transformed healthcare by enhancing diagnostics, medical writing, education, and project management. They assisted in drafting medical documents, creating training simulations, and streamlining research processes. Despite their growing utility in assisted diagnosis and improving doctor-patient communication, challenges per
Record details
Published: 23 April 2024
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Application of ChatGPT-assisted problem-based learning teaching method in clinical medical education
OpenAlex · 11 January 2025
AI versus human-generated multiple-choice questions for medical education: a cohort study in a high-stakes examination
OpenAlex · 8 February 2025
Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings
OpenAlex · 7 July 2023
Impact of large language model (ChatGPT) in healthcare: an umbrella review and evidence synthesis
OpenAlex · 7 May 2025
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns
OpenAlex · 19 March 2023
The rise of <scp>ChatGPT</scp>: Exploring its potential in medical education
OpenAlex · 14 March 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 April 2024), “The application of large language models in medicine: A scoping review,” evidence record 9500, https://ethics.ai/record/9500 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.