ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have been transforming the landscape of scientific research. Out of which, the chatbot technology has experienced tremendous advancements in recent years, especially with ChatGPT emerging as a notable AI language model. This comprehensive review delves into the background, applications, key challenges, and future directions of ChatGPT. We begin by exploring its origins, development, and underlying technology, before examining its
Record details
Published: 1 January 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
ChatGPT and large language models in academia: opportunities and challenges
OpenAlex · 13 July 2023
Cultural bias and cultural alignment of large language models
OpenAlex · 1 September 2024
Generalization bias in large language model summarization of scientific research
OpenAlex · 1 April 2025
Six Institutional Intervention Areas to Support Ethical and Effective Student Use of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Narrative Review
OpenAlex · 16 January 2026
Gender Bias in Generative AI-assisted Recruitment Processes
arXiv · 12 March 2026
PriHA: A RAG-Enhanced LLM Framework for Primary Healthcare Assistant in Hong Kong
arXiv · 10 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 January 2023), “ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope,” evidence record 9269, https://ethics.ai/record/9269 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.