Gender Bias in Generative AI-assisted Recruitment Processes
In recent years, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems have assumed increasingly crucial roles in selection processes, personnel recruitment and analysis of candidates' profiles. However, the employment of large language models (LLMs) risks reproducing, and in some cases amplifying, gender stereotypes and bias already present in the labour market. The objective of this paper is to evaluate and measure this phenomenon, analysing how a state-of-the-art generative model (GPT-5) suggest
Record details
Published: 12 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Jobs & economy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Six Institutional Intervention Areas to Support Ethical and Effective Student Use of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Narrative Review
OpenAlex · 16 January 2026
Plagiarism or Productivity? Students Moral Disengagement and Behavioral Intentions to Use ChatGPT in Academic Writing
arXiv · 20 March 2026
PriHA: A RAG-Enhanced LLM Framework for Primary Healthcare Assistant in Hong Kong
arXiv · 10 April 2026
Can Persona-Prompted LLMs Emulate Subgroup Values? An Empirical Analysis of Generalisability and Fairness in Cultural Alignment
arXiv · 14 April 2026
Dream machine -- the next creative economy
arXiv · 21 May 2026
The Misclassification of Autistic Writing as AI-Generated
arXiv cs.HC · 16 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 March 2026), “Gender Bias in Generative AI-assisted Recruitment Processes,” evidence record 7341, https://ethics.ai/record/7341 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.