Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients
Objective: The attitudes about the usage of artificial intelligence in healthcare are controversial. Unlike the perception of healthcare professionals, the attitudes of patients and their companions have been of less interest so far. In this study, we aimed to investigate the perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare among this highly relevant group along with the influence of digital affinity and sociodemographic factors. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using a paper-bas
Record details
Published: 1 January 2022
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss
OpenAlex · 11 December 2021
A multi-omics approach unravels metagenomic and metabolic alterations of a probiotic and synbiotic additive in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
OpenAlex · 30 January 2022
The medical algorithmic audit
OpenAlex · 5 April 2022
Challenges to implementing artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative interview study with healthcare leaders in Sweden
OpenAlex · 1 July 2022
Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol
OpenAlex · 1 June 2021
The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review
OpenAlex · 10 April 2021
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 January 2022), “Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients,” evidence record 9250, https://ethics.ai/record/9250 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.