The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) in the healthcare sector is receiving attention from researchers and health professionals. Few previous studies have investigated this topic from a multi-disciplinary perspective, including accounting, business and management, decision sciences and health professions. METHODS: The structured literature review with its reliable and replicable research protocol allowed the researchers to extract 288 peer-reviewed papers from Scopus. The authors
Record details
Published: 10 April 2021
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Deep learning-based artificial intelligence model to assist thyroid nodule diagnosis and management: a multicentre diagnostic study
OpenAlex · 23 March 2021
Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol
OpenAlex · 1 June 2021
Challenges and advances in clinical applications of mesenchymal stromal cells
OpenAlex · 12 February 2021
A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss
OpenAlex · 11 December 2021
Use of AI-based tools for healthcare purposes: a survey study from consumers’ perspectives
OpenAlex · 22 July 2020
Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients
OpenAlex · 1 January 2022
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 April 2021), “The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review,” evidence record 8874, https://ethics.ai/record/8874 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.