Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol
INTRODUCTION: Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Study (STARD) was developed to improve the completeness and transparency of reporting in studies investigating diagnostic test accuracy. However, its current form, STARD 2015 does not address the issues and challenges raised by artificial intelligence (AI)-centred interventions. As such, we propose an AI-specific version of the STARD checklist (STARD-AI), which focuses on the reporting of AI diagnostic test accuracy studies. This paper
Record details
Published: 1 June 2021
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Transparency · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The medical algorithmic audit
OpenAlex · 5 April 2022
Explainable Multi-Task Retinal Imaging Reveals Microvascular Signals for Systemic Risk Stratification in Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
arXiv · 24 May 2026
Do emulated quantum circuits change what CNNs look at? Performance and explainability comparison in medical image classification
arXiv fairness query · 23 July 2026
Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for XAI in Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review
OpenAlex · 31 May 2021
Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
OpenAlex · 1 July 2021
The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review
OpenAlex · 10 April 2021
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 June 2021), “Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol,” evidence record 8984, https://ethics.ai/record/8984 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.