A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss
BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to evaluate AI chatbot characteristics, functions, and core conversational capacities and investigate whether AI chatbot interventions were effective in changing physical activity, healthy eating, weight management behaviors, and other related health outcomes. METHODS: In collaboration with a medical librarian, six electronic bibliographic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, ACM Digital Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and IEEE) were searched to identify relevan
Record details
Published: 11 December 2021
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients
OpenAlex · 1 January 2022
A multi-omics approach unravels metagenomic and metabolic alterations of a probiotic and synbiotic additive in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
OpenAlex · 30 January 2022
The medical algorithmic audit
OpenAlex · 5 April 2022
Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol
OpenAlex · 1 June 2021
Challenges to implementing artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative interview study with healthcare leaders in Sweden
OpenAlex · 1 July 2022
The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review
OpenAlex · 10 April 2021
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 December 2021), “A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss,” evidence record 9024, https://ethics.ai/record/9024 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.