Teacher’s Perceptions of Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based Educational Tool for Scientific Writing
Efforts have constantly been made to incorporate AI into teaching and learning; however, the successful implementation of new instructional technologies is closely related to the attitudes of the teachers who lead the lesson. Teachers’ perceptions of AI utilization have only been investigated by only few scholars due an overall lack of experience of teachers regarding how AI can be utilized in the classroom as well as no specific idea of what AI-adopted tools would be like. This study investigat
Record details
Published: 29 March 2022
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Learning analytics dashboard: a tool for providing actionable insights to learners
OpenAlex · 14 February 2022
Academia's responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID‐19
OpenAlex · 12 February 2022
Artificial Intelligence in Education: AIEd for Personalised Learning Pathways
OpenAlex · 9 December 2022
Impact of ChatGPT on Learning Motivation:
OpenAlex · 7 March 2023
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns
OpenAlex · 19 March 2023
What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students
OpenAlex · 19 April 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 March 2022), “Teacher’s Perceptions of Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based Educational Tool for Scientific Writing,” evidence record 9195, https://ethics.ai/record/9195 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.