Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education
Engineering education is constantly evolving to keep up with the latest technological developments and meet the changing needs of the engineering industry. One promising development in this field is the use of generative artificial intelligence technology, such as the ChatGPT conversational agent. ChatGPT has the potential to offer personalized and effective learning experiences by providing students with customized feedback and explanations, as well as creating realistic virtual simulations for
Record details
Published: 30 December 2022
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning
OpenAlex · 1 January 2023
Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond
OpenAlex · 1 January 2023
Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education
OpenAlex · 7 January 2023
Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 10 January 2023
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
OpenAlex · 25 January 2023
Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape
OpenAlex · 13 February 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (30 December 2022), “Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education,” evidence record 9189, https://ethics.ai/record/9189 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.