Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape
While ChatGPT has recently become very popular, AI has a long history and philosophy. This paper intends to explore the promises and pitfalls of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) AI and potentially future technologies by adopting a speculative methodology. Speculative future narratives with a specific focus on educational contexts are provided in an attempt to identify emerging themes and discuss their implications for education in the 21st century. Affordances of (using) AI in Educat
Record details
Published: 13 February 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing
OpenAlex · 19 February 2023
What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education
OpenAlex · 22 February 2023
The Role of ChatGPT, Generative Language Models, and Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Conversation With ChatGPT and a Call for Papers
OpenAlex · 2 March 2023
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
OpenAlex · 25 January 2023
Impact of ChatGPT on Learning Motivation:
OpenAlex · 7 March 2023
ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation
OpenAlex · 7 March 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 February 2023), “Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape,” evidence record 9442, https://ethics.ai/record/9442 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.