ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
ChatGPT is the world’s most advanced chatbot thus far. Unlike other chatbots, it can create impressive prose within seconds, and it has created much hype and doomsday predictions when it comes to student assessment in higher education and a host of other matters. ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art language model (a variant of OpenAI’s Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) language model) designed to generate text that can be indistinguishable from text written by humans. It can engage in conversati
Record details
Published: 25 January 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 10 January 2023
Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education
OpenAlex · 7 January 2023
Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape
OpenAlex · 13 February 2023
Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning
OpenAlex · 1 January 2023
Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond
OpenAlex · 1 January 2023
Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing
OpenAlex · 19 February 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (25 January 2023), “ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?,” evidence record 9273, https://ethics.ai/record/9273 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.