A Qualitative Exploration of Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness
Algorithmic systems increasingly shape information people are exposed to as well as influence decisions about employment, finances, and other opportunities. In some cases, algorithmic systems may be more or less favorable to certain groups or individuals, sparking substantial discussion of algorithmic fairness in public policy circles, academia, and the press. We broaden this discussion by exploring how members of potentially affected communities feel about algorithmic fairness. We conducted wor
Record details
Published: 20 April 2018
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Jobs & economy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Information Fiduciaries and the First Amendment
OpenAlex · 3 February 2016
Exploring automation bias in human–AI collaboration: a review and implications for explainable AI
OpenAlex · 3 July 2025
Six Institutional Intervention Areas to Support Ethical and Effective Student Use of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Narrative Review
OpenAlex · 16 January 2026
What is ethical: AIHED driving humans or Human-Driven AIHED? A conceptual framework enabling the ‘ethos’ of AI-driven higher education
OpenAlex · 19 May 2026
Beyond the Algorithm: Professional Experiences and Perceptions of AI Bias
arXiv · 13 June 2026
Civil Rights Letter to the House Democratic AI Commission
Center for Democracy & Technology · 16 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (20 April 2018), “A Qualitative Exploration of Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness,” evidence record 8362, https://ethics.ai/record/8362 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.