A Consensus-Driven Multi-LLM Pipeline for Missing-Person Investigations
The first 72 hours of a missing-person investigation are critical for successful recovery. Guardian is an end-to-end system designed to support missing-child investigation and early search planning. This paper presents the Guardian LLM Pipeline, a multi-model system in which LLMs are used for intelligent information extraction and processing related to missing-person search operations. The pipeline coordinates end-to-end execution across task-specialized LLM models and invokes a consensus LLM en
Record details
Published: 9 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Interpretable Markov-Based Spatiotemporal Risk Surfaces for Missing-Child Search Planning with Reinforcement Learning and LLM-Based Quality Assurance
arXiv · 9 March 2026
LLM-based Schema-Guided Extraction and Validation of Missing-Person Intelligence from Heterogeneous Data Sources
arXiv · 8 April 2026
LLM Use, Cheating, and Academic Integrity in Software Engineering Education
arXiv · 17 March 2026
Student views in AI Ethics and Social Impact
arXiv · 19 March 2026
Thinking in Different Spaces: Domain-Specific Latent Geometry Survives Cross-Architecture Translation
arXiv · 20 March 2026
Exploring Data Augmentation and Resampling Strategies for Transformer-Based Models to Address Class Imbalance in AI Scoring of Scientific Explanations in NGSS Classroom
arXiv · 21 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 March 2026), “A Consensus-Driven Multi-LLM Pipeline for Missing-Person Investigations,” evidence record 7464, https://ethics.ai/record/7464 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.