Interpretable Markov-Based Spatiotemporal Risk Surfaces for Missing-Child Search Planning with Reinforcement Learning and LLM-Based Quality Assurance
The first 72 hours of a missing-child investigation are critical for successful recovery. However, law enforcement agencies often face fragmented, unstructured data and a lack of dynamic, geospatial predictive tools. Our system, Guardian, provides an end-to-end decision-support system for missing-child investigation and early search planning. It converts heterogeneous, unstructured case documents into a schema-aligned spatiotemporal representation, enriches cases with geocoding and transportatio
Record details
Published: 9 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Children & education · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A Consensus-Driven Multi-LLM Pipeline for Missing-Person Investigations
arXiv · 9 March 2026
LLM-based Schema-Guided Extraction and Validation of Missing-Person Intelligence from Heterogeneous Data Sources
arXiv · 8 April 2026
How unique are hallucinated citations offered by generative Artificial Intelligence models?
arXiv · 31 March 2026
Enabling and Inhibitory Pathways of Students' AI Use Concealment Intention in Higher Education: Evidence from SEM and fsQCA
arXiv · 13 April 2026
Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipe
arXiv · 14 April 2026
A Systematic AI Adoption Framework for Higher Education: From Student GenAI Usage to Institutional Integration
arXiv · 23 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 March 2026), “Interpretable Markov-Based Spatiotemporal Risk Surfaces for Missing-Child Search Planning with Reinforcement Learning and LLM-Based Quality Assurance,” evidence record 7468, https://ethics.ai/record/7468 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.