Evidence record 7396 · automatically gathered

VulnAgent-R2: Evidence-Calibrated Multi-Agent Auditing for Repository-Level Vulnerability Detection

Software vulnerabilities often depend on cross-file data flow, build options, framework conventions, and runtime guards, so isolated function classifiers produce fragile and poorly calibrated warnings. Repository-level LLM agents can gather richer evidence, but prior variants under-specify reproducibility, verifier behavior, baseline fairness, and statistical uncertainty. We present VulnAgent-R2, a budget-aware agentic auditing framework with three additional reusable modules: counterfactual evi

Record details

Published: 11 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (11 March 2026), “VulnAgent-R2: Evidence-Calibrated Multi-Agent Auditing for Repository-Level Vulnerability Detection,” evidence record 7396, https://ethics.ai/record/7396 (originally published by arXiv).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.