Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment
Large Language Model agents have rapidly evolved from static text generators into dynamic systems capable of executing complex autonomous workflows. To enhance reliability, multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing. While such role-playing effectively leverages domain expert knowledge, we find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry (AOA). Specifically, an agent acting
Record details
Published: 21 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
FairQE: Multi-Agent Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias in Translation Quality Estimation
arXiv · 23 April 2026
Bias in the Loop: Auditing LLM-as-a-Judge for Software Engineering
arXiv · 18 April 2026
A Framework for Longitudinal Health AI Agents
arXiv · 13 April 2026
TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1
arXiv · 29 April 2026
From Helpful to Trustworthy: LLM Agents for Pair Programming
arXiv · 11 April 2026
Position: Safety and Fairness in Agentic AI Depend on Interaction Topology, Not on Model Scale or Alignment
arXiv · 1 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (21 April 2026), “Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment,” evidence record 5539, https://ethics.ai/record/5539 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.