TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) and Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) in high-stakes domains demand reliable verification, yet centralized approaches suffer four limitations: (1) Robustness, with single points of failure vulnerable to attacks and bias; (2) Scalability, as reasoning complexity creates bottlenecks; (3) Opacity, as hidden auditing erodes trust; and (4) Privacy, as exposed reasoning traces risk model theft. We introduce TRUST (Transparent, Robust, and Unified Services for Trustworthy AI), a d
Record details
Published: 29 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Privacy · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Trustworthy AI Suffers from Invariance Conflicts and Causality is The Solution
arXiv · 4 May 2026
ADAPTS: Agentic Decomposition for Automated Protocol-agnostic Tracking of Symptoms
arXiv · 4 May 2026
FairHealth: An Open-Source Python Library for Trustworthy Healthcare AI in Low-Resource Settings
arXiv · 5 May 2026
Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment
arXiv · 21 April 2026
Governing AI-Assisted Security Operations: A Design Science Framework for Operational Decision Support
arXiv · 10 May 2026
Bias in the Loop: Auditing LLM-as-a-Judge for Software Engineering
arXiv · 18 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 April 2026), “TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1,” evidence record 5206, https://ethics.ai/record/5206 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.