Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework
Abstract While Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) research has at its core the desire to support student learning, experience from other AI domains suggest that such ethical intentions are not by themselves sufficient. There is also the need to consider explicitly issues such as fairness, accountability, transparency, bias, autonomy, agency, and inclusion. At a more general level, there is also a need to differentiate between doing ethical things and doing things ethically , to understa
Record details
Published: 9 April 2021
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Children & education · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI
OpenAlex · 18 March 2021
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education
OpenAlex · 1 January 2022
Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review
OpenAlex · 1 January 2023
Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making
OpenAlex · 20 April 2018
VulnAgent-R2: Evidence-Calibrated Multi-Agent Auditing for Repository-Level Vulnerability Detection
arXiv · 11 March 2026
Explainable Speech Emotion Recognition: Weighted Attribute Fairness to Model Demographic Contributions to Social Bias
arXiv · 26 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 April 2021), “Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework,” evidence record 8871, https://ethics.ai/record/8871 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.