The impact of generative artificial intelligence on academic development of Chinese students in humanities and social sciences
Generative artificial intelligence(GenAI) is reshaping learning in higher education, with particularly pronounced implications for the humanities and social sciences(HSS), where learning outcomes are commonly expressed through written and interpretive forms that align closely with GenAI's capabilities. Yet, systematic evidence on the educational impacts of GenAI on HSS students remains limited. Addressing this gap, this study draws on a large-scale survey of HSS students in China to examine its
Record details
Published: 23 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Teacher feedback and ChatGPT feedback on Chinese university EFL learners’ English essay revision: A mixed-methods study
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
AI avatars are reshaping society in China — the law is trying to catch up
Nature Machine Intelligence · 14 July 2026
AI Sovereignty as National Learning Capacity: A Human-Centered Learning Mechanics Viewpoint on France, the United States, and China
arXiv · 30 May 2026
Balancing public health and individual autonomy: a study of Chinas vaccination policy
Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ) · 22 July 2026
A Framework for Developing University Policies on Generative AI Governance: A Cross-national Comparative Study
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
Social Media as a Driver of Obesity in Children and Adolescents (Aged 6-18 Years): It Is Time for Regulatory Action
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 June 2026), “The impact of generative artificial intelligence on academic development of Chinese students in humanities and social sciences,” evidence record 671, https://ethics.ai/record/671 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.