Teacher feedback and ChatGPT feedback on Chinese university EFL learners’ English essay revision: A mixed-methods study
Publication date: June 2026 Source: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, Volume 10 Author(s): Feifei Han, Zehua Wang
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students
OpenAlex · 15 December 2023
An exploratory machine learning approach to understanding determinants of future ChatGPT use in higher education
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
AI-assisted writing and the impact of ChatGPT on Greek-speaking students with and without learning disabilities. Outcomes from a repeated measures design
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
A Comparative Analysis of Institutional and Course Generative AI Policies within Higher Education: Implications for Instruction in Computing Education
arXiv cs.CY · 15 July 2026
The Evolving Media Discourse on ChatGPT and Higher Education
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
When AI Takes the Couch: Psychometric Jailbreaks Reveal Internal Conflict in Frontier Models
arXiv cs.CY · 21 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “Teacher feedback and ChatGPT feedback on Chinese university EFL learners’ English essay revision: A mixed-methods study,” evidence record 2355, https://ethics.ai/record/2355 (originally published by Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.