A Framework for Developing University Policies on Generative AI Governance: A Cross-national Comparative Study
arXiv:2504.02636v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As generative AI (GAI) becomes increasingly embedded in higher education, universities worldwide are developing policies to govern its ethical, pedagogical, and institutional use. However, these policies vary across national and institutional contexts. We undertake a cross-nationalanalysis of GAI guidelines issued by leading universities in the United States, Japan, and China, identifying key policy orientations and proposing a structured frame
Record details
Published: 28 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Children & education
Retrieved: 28 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AI Sovereignty as National Learning Capacity: A Human-Centered Learning Mechanics Viewpoint on France, the United States, and China
arXiv · 30 May 2026
Open Veins of Algorithmic Auditing: Why AI Assessment Lags Behind Its Deployment in the Global South
arXiv · 23 July 2026
International PhD students to face strict limits on time in the US
Nature Machine Intelligence · 22 July 2026
Balancing public health and individual autonomy: a study of Chinas vaccination policy
Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ) · 22 July 2026
Teaching Intro AI When the Tools Can Do the Homework: A Course Redesign and a Student Bill of Rights
arXiv cs.CY · 7 August 2026
AI avatars are reshaping society in China — the law is trying to catch up
Nature Machine Intelligence · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (28 July 2026), “A Framework for Developing University Policies on Generative AI Governance: A Cross-national Comparative Study,” evidence record 13805, https://ethics.ai/record/13805 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.