From Helpful to Trustworthy: LLM Agents for Pair Programming
LLM-based coding agents are increasingly used to generate code, tests, and documentation. Still, their outputs can be plausible yet misaligned with developer intent and provide limited evidence for review in evolving projects. This limits our understanding of how to structure LLM pair-programming workflows so that artifacts remain reliable, auditable, and maintainable over time. To address this gap, this doctoral research proposes a systematic study of multi-agent LLM pair programming that exter
Record details
Published: 11 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A Framework for Longitudinal Health AI Agents
arXiv · 13 April 2026
DIRECT: Video Mashup Creation via Hierarchical Multi-Agent Planning and Intent-Guided Editing
arXiv · 6 April 2026
Coupled Control, Structured Memory, and Verifiable Action in Agentic AI (SCRAT -- Stochastic Control with Retrieval and Auditable Trajectories): A Comparative Perspective from Squirrel Locomotion and Scatter-Hoarding
arXiv · 3 April 2026
Cognitive Comparability and the Limits of Governance: Evaluating Authority Under Radical Capability Asymmetry
arXiv · 3 April 2026
Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment
arXiv · 21 April 2026
MILD: Mediator Agent System with Bidirectional Perception and Multi-Layered Alignment for Human-Vehicle Collaboration
arXiv · 2 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 April 2026), “From Helpful to Trustworthy: LLM Agents for Pair Programming,” evidence record 6025, https://ethics.ai/record/6025 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.