FairQE: Multi-Agent Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias in Translation Quality Estimation
Quality Estimation (QE) aims to assess machine translation quality without reference translations, but recent studies have shown that existing QE models exhibit systematic gender bias. In particular, they tend to favor masculine realizations in gender-ambiguous contexts and may assign higher scores to gender-misaligned translations even when gender is explicitly specified. To address these issues, we propose FairQE, a multi-agent-based, fairness-aware QE framework that mitigates gender bias in b
Record details
Published: 23 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment
arXiv · 21 April 2026
Position: Safety and Fairness in Agentic AI Depend on Interaction Topology, Not on Model Scale or Alignment
arXiv · 1 May 2026
Frequency-Enhanced Diffusion Models: Curriculum-Guided Semantic Alignment for Zero-Shot Skeleton Action Recognition
arXiv · 10 April 2026
Strat-LLM: Stratified Strategy Alignment for LLM-based Stock Trading with Real-time Multi-Source Signals
arXiv · 7 May 2026
BeliefShift: Benchmarking Temporal Belief Consistency and Opinion Drift in LLM Agents
arXiv · 25 March 2026
LLM Constitutional Multi-Agent Governance
arXiv · 13 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 April 2026), “FairQE: Multi-Agent Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias in Translation Quality Estimation,” evidence record 5457, https://ethics.ai/record/5457 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.