Quantifying and Mitigating Self-Preference Bias of LLM Judges
LLM-as-a-Judge has become a dominant approach in automated evaluation systems, playing critical roles in model alignment, leaderboard construction, quality control, and so on. However, the scalability and trustworthiness of this approach can be substantially distorted by Self-Preference Bias (SPB), which is a directional evaluative deviation in which LLMs systematically favor or disfavor their own generated outputs during evaluation. Existing measurements rely on costly human annotations and con
Record details
Published: 24 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
FairQE: Multi-Agent Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias in Translation Quality Estimation
arXiv · 23 April 2026
OceanPile: A Large-Scale Multimodal Ocean Corpus for Foundation Models
arXiv · 25 April 2026
Applications of the Transformer Architecture in AI-Assisted English Reading Comprehension
arXiv · 26 April 2026
Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment
arXiv · 21 April 2026
Evaluating Risks in Weak-to-Strong Alignment: A Bias-Variance Perspective
arXiv · 28 April 2026
ProtoCLIP: Prototype-Aligned Latent Refinement for Robust Zero-Shot Chest X-Ray Classification
arXiv · 20 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (24 April 2026), “Quantifying and Mitigating Self-Preference Bias of LLM Judges,” evidence record 5413, https://ethics.ai/record/5413 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.