Evaluating Risks in Weak-to-Strong Alignment: A Bias-Variance Perspective
Weak-to-strong alignment offers a promising route to scalable supervision, but it can fail when a strong model becomes confidently wrong on examples that lie in the weak teacher's blind spots. Understanding such failures requires going beyond aggregate accuracy, since weak-to-strong errors depend not only on whether the strong model disagrees with its teacher, but also on how confidence and uncertainty are distributed across examples. In this work, we analyze weak-to-strong alignment through a b
Record details
Published: 28 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Below-Chance Blindness: Prompted Underperformance in Small LLMs Produces Positional Bias Rather than Answer Avoidance
arXiv · 28 April 2026
Applications of the Transformer Architecture in AI-Assisted English Reading Comprehension
arXiv · 26 April 2026
A Gated Hybrid Contrastive Collaborative Filtering Recommendation
arXiv · 29 April 2026
OceanPile: A Large-Scale Multimodal Ocean Corpus for Foundation Models
arXiv · 25 April 2026
Quantifying and Mitigating Self-Preference Bias of LLM Judges
arXiv · 24 April 2026
Position: Safety and Fairness in Agentic AI Depend on Interaction Topology, Not on Model Scale or Alignment
arXiv · 1 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (28 April 2026), “Evaluating Risks in Weak-to-Strong Alignment: A Bias-Variance Perspective,” evidence record 5287, https://ethics.ai/record/5287 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.