Knowing the Rules Is Not Enough: Student Regulatory Awareness and Use of GenAI in Higher Education
Context: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT are increasingly integrated into students learning practices. While previous research mainly examines adoption rates and attitudes, students awareness of institutional regulations and their perceived compliance remain unexplored. Understanding whether regulatory awareness influences student behavior is therefore important as higher education institutions create and apply AI policies. Objective: This study investigates how
Record details
Published: 16 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Children & education · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Reimagining Assessment in the Age of Generative AI: Lessons from Open-Book Exams with ChatGPT
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Regulating Artificial Intimacy: From Locks and Blocks to Relational Accountability
arXiv · 20 April 2026
From GPT-3 to GPT-5: Mapping their capabilities, scope, limitations, and consequences
arXiv · 11 April 2026
LLM-assisted formalization for deterministic detection of statutory inconsistency in tax law
Artificial Intelligence and Law · 10 July 2026
Self-Regulated Personal Contracts as a Harm Reduction Approach to Generative AI in Undergraduate Programming Education
arXiv · 11 March 2026
Do people rely on ChatGPT more than their peers to detect deepfake news?
arXiv cs.CY · 4 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 May 2026), “Knowing the Rules Is Not Enough: Student Regulatory Awareness and Use of GenAI in Higher Education,” evidence record 4222, https://ethics.ai/record/4222 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.