From GPT-3 to GPT-5: Mapping their capabilities, scope, limitations, and consequences
We present the progress of the GPT family from GPT-3 through GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, and the GPT-5 family. Our work is comparative rather than merely historical. We investigates how the family evolved in technical framing, user interaction, modality, deployment architecture, and governance viewpoint. The work focuses on five recurring themes: technical progression, capability changes, deployment shifts, persistent limitations, and downstream consequences. In term of researc
Record details
Published: 11 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Knowing the Rules Is Not Enough: Student Regulatory Awareness and Use of GenAI in Higher Education
arXiv · 16 May 2026
LLM-assisted formalization for deterministic detection of statutory inconsistency in tax law
Artificial Intelligence and Law · 10 July 2026
Why are OpenAI and Anthropic cheering on regulation in Australia? The answer has global reach
The Guardian · 22 July 2026
Dario Amodei, CEO de Anthropic: "Mythos es un arma total. Deberías necesitar una licencia de armas para usarlo"
Xataka (ES) · 24 July 2026
Joshua Kushner’s Thrive Capital Discloses $215 Million Amazon Stake
The Next Web AI · 14 August 2026
When AI Tells You What You Want to Hear: Sycophantic Behavior of Large Language Models in Dementia Care Settings
arXiv · 13 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 April 2026), “From GPT-3 to GPT-5: Mapping their capabilities, scope, limitations, and consequences,” evidence record 6020, https://ethics.ai/record/6020 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.