Access Timing as Scaffolding: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to GenAI in Education
arXiv:2605.15850v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In recent years, generative AI (GenAI) in educational settings has become ubiquitous in university students' daily lives, despite its potential to induce over-reliance, metacognitive disengagement, and diminished learning when used unrestrictedly. While most prior research has focused on how to pedagogically scaffold its usage, the question of when to allow off-the-shelf GenAI remains understudied and lacks pedagogically grounded empirical inve
Record details
Published: 12 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
ELBench: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Education-Facing Large Language Models
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
Rural School Bus Routing and Scheduling
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
Two-Phase Simulated Annealing for Equitable Team Formation: Eliminating Complaints in Large Engineering Cohorts
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
AI-Generated Interactive Fiction for Educational Use: A Pilot Study of Perceived Comprehensibility, Coherence, and Engagement
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
INSIDE the Student's Mind: Jointly Modeling Latent Reasoning and Action in LLM Student Simulators
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Codebook-Guided Coding of Students' Mathematics Metaphor Responses
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 August 2026), “Access Timing as Scaffolding: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to GenAI in Education,” evidence record 18370, https://ethics.ai/record/18370 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.