Most biomedical publications show signs of LLM-assisted writing
arXiv:2608.10715v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Over the past several years, LLM-powered chatbots and agents have become widely used as a tool for academic writing. LLM-assisted writing can be valuable by removing language barriers but at the same time causes concerns about misconduct and fraud. To inform policy decisions, it is necessary to monitor the prevalence of LLM-altered texts in scholarly publications. Despite some recent progress in this direction, no existing method can produce reli
Record details
Published: 12 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Beyond Memory: A Transactional Continuity Kernel for Long-Lived AI Agents
arXiv · 12 August 2026
AI Guardrail Survival under Single-Cycle Agentic Self-Summarization
arXiv · 11 August 2026
From Numbers to Judgment: Specialist LLM Agents and Reinforcement Learning for European Listed Real Estate
arXiv · 11 August 2026
Governing Agentic AI in FinTech
arXiv · 11 August 2026
Learning Loco-Manipulation From SMPC Demonstrations With Sparse Offline-to-Online RL
arXiv · 12 August 2026
Test-Time Self-Evolving GUI Visual Grounding via Reflection-Guided On-Policy Self-Distillation
arXiv cs.AI · 11 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 August 2026), “Most biomedical publications show signs of LLM-assisted writing,” evidence record 18366, https://ethics.ai/record/18366 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.