Evidence record 18807 · automatically gathered

AI Guardrail Survival under Single-Cycle Agentic Self-Summarization

Long-running agents periodically compact their context, replacing the transcript with a model-generated summary.Recent work shows that dropping a standing safety constraint during compaction drives behavioral violations acrossmany models (Governance Decay; Chen, 2026). We ask a finer question: under a single compaction cycle, how is a safetyrule lost, and what does that imply for detection and evaluation? Our central finding is that a presence check is not asafety check: when compaction does not

Record details

Published: 11 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 13 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “AI Guardrail Survival under Single-Cycle Agentic Self-Summarization,” evidence record 18807, https://ethics.ai/record/18807 (originally published by arXiv).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.