Governing Agentic AI in FinTech
Financial institutions are delegating consequential decisions to agentic AI systems that decompose goals, coordinate models and tools, and act with little oversight. Yet agentic AI governance in FinTech is under-investigated. We argue the binding governance constraint is not capability but verifiability. We define the Verifiability Gap as the shortfall between the verification delegated authority demands and the explainability and reproducibility retained after a decision. It is indexed to a ver
Record details
Published: 11 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy · Transparency · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 13 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Governing Agentic AI in FinTech
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Narmi releases AI to streamline account opening for communitty banks and credit unions
Finextra AI · 13 July 2026
Beyond Memory: A Transactional Continuity Kernel for Long-Lived AI Agents
arXiv · 12 August 2026
WebRider: Persona-Conditioned Intent Controllers for Live-Web Assistance
arXiv cs.HC · 7 August 2026
Beyond Top-K: Replacing Black-Box Retrieval with Interpretable Agentic Operations
arXiv · 6 August 2026
From Siloed Algorithms to Compliance-First Agentic Platforms: A Multi-Layered Architecture for Hospital AI Systems
arXiv · 6 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “Governing Agentic AI in FinTech,” evidence record 18810, https://ethics.ai/record/18810 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.