Evidence record 18351 · automatically gathered

Who Gets Heeded? An Obligation-Level Audit of Responsiveness in EPA Rulemaking

arXiv:2608.10329v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Notice-and-comment rulemaking gives any affected party the same formal right to influence federal regulation, but formal access is not substantive capacity to shape rule text. Existing strategies operate at the rule or aggregate-corpus level, too coarse to capture the discrete regulatory obligations where commenters seek change. We introduce obligation-level responsiveness auditing, an auditable, AI-assisted framework for measuring whether public-c

Record details

Published: 12 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 12 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (12 August 2026), “Who Gets Heeded? An Obligation-Level Audit of Responsiveness in EPA Rulemaking,” evidence record 18351, https://ethics.ai/record/18351 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.