Unfit for stranding assessment: a panel-scale multimodal-LLM audit of building-decarbonisation disclosure (BeDA)
arXiv:2607.22006v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Buildings account for roughly 34% of global final energy use and 37% of energy- and process-related CO$_2$ emissions. Stranding regulation now being enacted (New York City Local Law 97, the EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive recast) presupposes that a building portfolio's carbon intensity can be measured per square metre and compared against a science-based pathway. Whether corporate disclosure is actually fit for that comparison has not,
Record details
Published: 27 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Transparency · Environment
Retrieved: 27 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Enabling Multilingual Privacy Policy Audits: Large-Scale Analysis of Spanish Mobile Apps
arXiv cs.CY · 22 July 2026
Short-term load forecasting under EU-AI Act Requirements in Safety-Critical Environments: Results from a 41-day live challenge on the aggregated German transmission-grid load
arXiv cs.AI · 5 August 2026
Trustworthy Smart Fabs via Professional Proxies: Scaling Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) through Industrial Data Spaces
arXiv · 8 June 2026
AI Watermark Evidence Fails Forensic Readiness: An Empirical Evaluation
arXiv cs.CY · 20 July 2026
AI Watermark Evidence Fails Forensic Readiness: An Empirical Evaluation
arXiv · 17 July 2026
Counterfactual Shapley Credit Assignment
arXiv cs.LG · 18 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 July 2026), “Unfit for stranding assessment: a panel-scale multimodal-LLM audit of building-decarbonisation disclosure (BeDA),” evidence record 13581, https://ethics.ai/record/13581 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.