Administrative Law's Fourth Settlement: AI and the Scrutable State
arXiv:2602.09678v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Since 1887, administrative law has confronted a problem of institutional cognition. Expert agencies are needed to govern technologically complex systems, but expertise makes agency decisions difficult for courts, Congress, and the public to understand and oversee. Administrative law has responded to this "capability-accountability trap" by requiring records, reason-giving, and transparency, drawn together through procedural review. These device
Record details
Published: 27 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 27 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Unfit for stranding assessment: a panel-scale multimodal-LLM audit of building-decarbonisation disclosure (BeDA)
arXiv cs.CY · 27 July 2026
AI Watermark Evidence Fails Forensic Readiness: An Empirical Evaluation
arXiv cs.CY · 20 July 2026
AI Watermark Evidence Fails Forensic Readiness: An Empirical Evaluation
arXiv · 17 July 2026
Who Gets Heeded? An Obligation-Level Audit of Responsiveness in EPA Rulemaking
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
Explainable AI-Driven Cyber Risk Analytics and Model Reliability Assessment for Intelligent Governance of U.S. Critical Infrastructure: An XGBoost and SHAP-Based Intrusion Detection Framework
arXiv · 4 June 2026
Regulating Artificial Intimacy: From Locks and Blocks to Relational Accountability
arXiv · 20 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 July 2026), “Administrative Law's Fourth Settlement: AI and the Scrutable State,” evidence record 13588, https://ethics.ai/record/13588 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.