Explainable AI-Driven Cyber Risk Analytics and Model Reliability Assessment for Intelligent Governance of U.S. Critical Infrastructure: An XGBoost and SHAP-Based Intrusion Detection Framework
The increasing penetrations of the critical infrastructure sector in the United States with intelligent digital technologies have greatly increased exposure to advanced cyber adversaries and operational vulnerabilities. AI-powered governance and automated decision-making systems are becoming a key part of the operation of critical infrastructure systems, including energy, healthcare, transportation, financial services, and communication infrastructure, in order to improve efficiency and strategi
Record details
Published: 4 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare · Military & security · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
enclawed: A Configurable, Sector-Neutral Hardening Framework for Single-User AI Assistant Gateways
arXiv · 18 April 2026
The Pentagon’s AI Strategy Has a Funding Problem
War on the Rocks · 9 July 2026
Regulatory Relief for Certain Stationary Sources to Promote American Chemical Manufacturing Security
White House · 13 July 2026
Didact: A Cross-Domain Capability Discovery System for Defence
arXiv · 5 June 2026
CEDAR-42001: From ISO/IEC 42001 Conformity to Architecture-Aware, Audit-Visible Assurance Posture for AI Cyber-Physical Systems
arXiv · 19 June 2026
Going Headless? On the Boundaries of Vertical AI Firms
arXiv · 18 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 June 2026), “Explainable AI-Driven Cyber Risk Analytics and Model Reliability Assessment for Intelligent Governance of U.S. Critical Infrastructure: An XGBoost and SHAP-Based Intrusion Detection Framework,” evidence record 1452, https://ethics.ai/record/1452 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.