SkillAligner: Treating Retrieved Skills as Adaptable Drafts at Execution Time
General-purpose skills promise reusable procedural knowledge for language agents, yet semantic relevance does not guarantee execution utility: a retrieved skill may encode assumptions that conflict with the current task, execution environment, or other retrieved skills. We formalize this problem as the skill--execution misfit. To address it, we propose SkillAligner, a training-free execution-time skill adaptation framework that treats retrieved skills as adaptable drafts rather than fixed instru
Record details
Published: 7 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.LG
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 10 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
ResidencyRL: Reinforcement Learning in Simulated Clinical Environments
arXiv · 7 August 2026
Design and Evaluation of a Touchscreen-Based Teleoperation Interface for Robotic Manipulators
arXiv cs.HC · 6 August 2026
EnvACE: Internalizing Environment Dynamics via World Rehearsal for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
arXiv cs.AI · 6 August 2026
Hardware Keystores for AI Agent Signing Workflows: A Zero-Trust MCP Enforcement Architecture
arXiv cs.AI · 6 August 2026
Are You Sure This is What You Really Want? Conversational Recommender Systems for Enhancing Human Autonomy
Science and Engineering Ethics · 8 August 2026
PFEA: a VLM-based high-level natural language planning and feedback embodied agent for human-centered AI
Frontiers in Robotics and AI · 6 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 August 2026), “SkillAligner: Treating Retrieved Skills as Adaptable Drafts at Execution Time,” evidence record 17942, https://ethics.ai/record/17942 (originally published by arXiv cs.LG).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.