Are You Sure This is What You Really Want? Conversational Recommender Systems for Enhancing Human Autonomy
Recommender systems are widely used to help users navigate information overload in digital environments. While they are often portrayed as tools that enhance autonomy by optimizing choice and personalizing content, this article argues that many current recommender systems designs in fact undermine user autonomy. Drawing on a conception of autonomy in which the formation and configuration of preferences, particularly higher-level desires in the Frankfurtian sense, play a prominent role, we examin
Record details
Published: 8 August 2026
Source: Science and Engineering Ethics
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 9 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
ResidencyRL: Reinforcement Learning in Simulated Clinical Environments
arXiv · 7 August 2026
SkillAligner: Treating Retrieved Skills as Adaptable Drafts at Execution Time
arXiv cs.LG · 7 August 2026
360CityArena: A Realistic Virtual Urban Navigation Benchmark for Embodied Agents
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 8 August 2026
Business Arena: Benchmarking LLM Agents in a Realistic Marketplace
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 8 August 2026
Design and Evaluation of a Touchscreen-Based Teleoperation Interface for Robotic Manipulators
arXiv cs.HC · 6 August 2026
EnvACE: Internalizing Environment Dynamics via World Rehearsal for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
arXiv cs.AI · 6 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (8 August 2026), “Are You Sure This is What You Really Want? Conversational Recommender Systems for Enhancing Human Autonomy,” evidence record 17706, https://ethics.ai/record/17706 (originally published by Science and Engineering Ethics).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.