AI-Assisted Peer Review Across Research Communities: From Reviewer AI Policies to LLM Review Quality
AI-assisted peer review is increasingly discussed and adopted as a tool to support the scientific publishing process, yet there is little systematic understanding of how publication venues regulate its use or of how capable current AI review systems are. We address these questions by first surveying reviewer-facing AI policies across 111 leading AI/NLP conferences and medical journals, revealing substantial regulation differences between the two communities. Second, we evaluate AI-generated peer
Record details
Published: 4 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare
Retrieved: 5 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Building and Governing AI Systems: Advancing Social Workers' Roles across the Technology Industry, Human Service Organizations, and Policy Institutions
arXiv · 4 August 2026
Optimal Liability Design for Medical AI
arXiv cs.CY · 5 August 2026
Explainable AI for the EU Right to Explanation: A Systematic Review of the Law-XAI Translation Gap
arXiv cs.CY · 5 August 2026
AI-Assisted Peer Review Across Research Communities: From Reviewer AI Policies to LLM Review Quality
arXiv cs.CY · 5 August 2026
AI governance at work: Threat appraisal, work experience, and satisfaction with job, health, and financial situation
Technology in Society · 3 August 2026
Building and Governing AI Systems: Advancing Social Workers' Roles across the Technology Industry, Human Service Organizations, and Policy Institutions
arXiv cs.CY · 6 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “AI-Assisted Peer Review Across Research Communities: From Reviewer AI Policies to LLM Review Quality,” evidence record 16281, https://ethics.ai/record/16281 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.