Optimal Liability Design for Medical AI
arXiv:2608.03114v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into medical decision-making, yet its liability implications remain complex, particularly when physicians differ in diagnostic skills and their quality is unobservable. This paper develops a principal-agent model in which a social planner designs medical liability to regulate a physician with private quality information who chooses between a standard treatment, a personalized judgment-based
Record details
Published: 5 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 5 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
From Siloed Algorithms to Compliance-First Agentic Platforms: A Multi-Layered Architecture for Hospital AI Systems
arXiv · 6 August 2026
Benchmarking the Benchmarks: Evaluating Benchmarks for Conversational Agents
arXiv cs.AI · 6 August 2026
The Optimizer Is the Agent: Reasoning-Driven Search across Prompts, Programs, and ML Workflows
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 6 August 2026
SocialFiVis: A Visual Analytics Sandbox for LLM-Grounded Multi-Agent Simulation in Social Finance
arXiv cs.HC · 9 August 2026
Why Do AI Agents Break Rules? How Framing, Context, and Social Signals Shape Compliance
arXiv cs.CY · 14 August 2026
OPERA: Offline Policy-guided Expert Routing and Adaptation for Universal Biomedical Image Analysis
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 26 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (5 August 2026), “Optimal Liability Design for Medical AI,” evidence record 16202, https://ethics.ai/record/16202 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.