AI-Assisted Peer Review Across Research Communities: From Reviewer AI Policies to LLM Review Quality
arXiv:2608.03581v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-assisted peer review is increasingly discussed and adopted as a tool to support the scientific publishing process, yet there is little systematic understanding of how publication venues regulate its use or of how capable current AI review systems are. We address these questions by first surveying reviewer-facing AI policies across 111 leading AI/NLP conferences and medical journals, revealing substantial regulation differences between the two co
Record details
Published: 5 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare
Retrieved: 5 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Optimal Liability Design for Medical AI
arXiv cs.CY · 5 August 2026
Explainable AI for the EU Right to Explanation: A Systematic Review of the Law-XAI Translation Gap
arXiv cs.CY · 5 August 2026
Building and Governing AI Systems: Advancing Social Workers' Roles across the Technology Industry, Human Service Organizations, and Policy Institutions
arXiv · 4 August 2026
AI-Assisted Peer Review Across Research Communities: From Reviewer AI Policies to LLM Review Quality
arXiv · 4 August 2026
Building and Governing AI Systems: Advancing Social Workers' Roles across the Technology Industry, Human Service Organizations, and Policy Institutions
arXiv cs.CY · 6 August 2026
From Siloed Algorithms to Compliance-First Agentic Platforms: A Multi-Layered Architecture for Hospital AI Systems
arXiv · 6 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (5 August 2026), “AI-Assisted Peer Review Across Research Communities: From Reviewer AI Policies to LLM Review Quality,” evidence record 16191, https://ethics.ai/record/16191 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.