Explainable AI for the EU Right to Explanation: A Systematic Review of the Law-XAI Translation Gap
arXiv:2608.02699v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When algorithms make or influence consequential decisions---about loan eligibility, hiring, or healthcare---EU law grants affected individuals a Right to Explanation. Yet whether (and how) Explainable AI (XAI) can satisfy this right in practice remains poorly understood, with direct implications for individuals' ability to contest automated decisions that affect their lives. This paper presents a systematic literature review of XAI in the context
Record details
Published: 5 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare · Transparency
Retrieved: 5 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Guiding AI in radiology: ESR’s recommendations for effective implementation of the European AI Act
OpenAlex · 13 February 2025
Clinical Audit Logs as Multi-Axial Traces of Care Delivery
arXiv cs.CY · 20 July 2026
Making Agent-Mediated Contributions Governable: A Project-Level Governance Manifest for Open-Source AI Collaboration
arXiv · 17 July 2026
Clinical Audit Logs as Multi-Axial Traces of Care Delivery
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Always-OnAgents:A Survey of Persistent Memory, State, and Governance in LLMAgents
arXiv · 29 June 2026
Clinical Harness for Governable Medical AI Skill Ecosystems
arXiv · 25 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (5 August 2026), “Explainable AI for the EU Right to Explanation: A Systematic Review of the Law-XAI Translation Gap,” evidence record 16199, https://ethics.ai/record/16199 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.