Evaluating the Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in Gaze-Based 3D Target Selection
State-of-the-art head-mounted displays (HMDs) enable gaze-based selection in virtual environments. Yet, these HMDs suffer from the vergence-accommodation conflict (VAC), which is known to affect interaction performance. The VAC might influence gaze-based selection performance because it directly affects eye-movement behavior. Thus, in this paper, we investigate how the VAC influences gaze-based 3D target selection across varying depth conditions. Our results show that as the (visual) depth incre
Record details
Published: 29 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.HC
Category: Research
Topics: Environment · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 31 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Revitalizing Public Urban Places through Cultural and Political Memory: A Technological Approach with LLMs and Augmented Reality
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
Amplifying the storm: Climate disinformation dynamics during natural disasters on right-wing extremist Telegram channels
HKS Misinformation Review · 23 July 2026
Exploring Cross-Reality Transitions between Projections and Head-Mounted Displays for Immersive Digital Art
arXiv cs.HC · 5 August 2026
MarsCast: Transfer Learning of AI Weather Foundation Models to Planetary Atmospheres
arXiv cs.AI · 5 August 2026
Transferable Above-Ground Biomass (AGB) Estimation Model from Multi-Sensor Data with Sparse Field Calibration
arXiv cs.LG · 12 August 2026
Turning OSINV inside the machine: Open-source investigations and information disorder
HKS Misinformation Review · 12 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 July 2026), “Evaluating the Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in Gaze-Based 3D Target Selection,” evidence record 15211, https://ethics.ai/record/15211 (originally published by arXiv cs.HC).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.