Optimal Causal Annotations: An Application to Casenotes in Social Services
arXiv:2502.10605v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Problem definition: Estimating causal effects of interventions is central to policy and operations, but outcome data are often missing or costly to obtain. LLMs can provide text annotation at scale but may be subject to unknown bias. When ground-truth outcomes require expensive expert labeling or follow-up, budget limits typically allow only a fraction of the data to be labeled. Motivated by collaboration with a nonprofit conducting stree
Record details
Published: 30 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation
Retrieved: 30 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Inference-Time Policy Alignment for Fair Reinforcement Learning
arXiv fairness query · 31 July 2026
A Computational Ethical Framework for Financial Digital Phenotyping for Mental Health
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Radio Resource Management under Coupled Finite-Horizon Constraints
arXiv fairness query · 3 August 2026
Diffusion Policy with Behavioral Advantage Correction for Offline Reinforcement Learning
arXiv cs.AI · 3 August 2026
AIDLC–governance indicator framework: a lifecycle-based approach to institutional AI governance
AI & Society · 4 August 2026
Whose ethics? Whose AI? Refining the Philippine AI Regulation Act toward a Contextual AI Ethic
AI & Society · 4 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (30 July 2026), “Optimal Causal Annotations: An Application to Casenotes in Social Services,” evidence record 14526, https://ethics.ai/record/14526 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.