Evidence record 14526 · automatically gathered

Optimal Causal Annotations: An Application to Casenotes in Social Services

arXiv:2502.10605v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Problem definition: Estimating causal effects of interventions is central to policy and operations, but outcome data are often missing or costly to obtain. LLMs can provide text annotation at scale but may be subject to unknown bias. When ground-truth outcomes require expensive expert labeling or follow-up, budget limits typically allow only a fraction of the data to be labeled. Motivated by collaboration with a nonprofit conducting stree

Record details

Published: 30 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation
Retrieved: 30 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (30 July 2026), “Optimal Causal Annotations: An Application to Casenotes in Social Services,” evidence record 14526, https://ethics.ai/record/14526 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.