Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Radio Resource Management under Coupled Finite-Horizon Constraints
Maximizing throughput under proportional fairness in dense wireless networks requires jointly managing user association, scheduling, base station (BS) activation, and handover control under hard finite-horizon energy and handover budgets, which induces a fundamental tension between BS-side energy management and user-side handover regulation. While multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is a natural framework for such distributed sequential control, its application here faces two difficulties:
Record details
Published: 3 August 2026
Source: arXiv fairness query
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 4 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AgentFAIR: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for FAIRness Evaluation of Geospatial Datasets
arXiv · 17 July 2026
Securing Agentic AI: From Per-Action Checks to Trajectory Assurance
arXiv · 3 August 2026
AtumAI: A Principled Framework for Agentic Generation of Datacenter Control-Plane Policies
arXiv cs.AI · 3 August 2026
Inference-Time Policy Alignment for Fair Reinforcement Learning
arXiv fairness query · 31 July 2026
EnvACE: Internalizing Environment Dynamics via World Rehearsal for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 5 August 2026
Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems
arXiv cs.AI · 31 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (3 August 2026), “Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Radio Resource Management under Coupled Finite-Horizon Constraints,” evidence record 16129, https://ethics.ai/record/16129 (originally published by arXiv fairness query).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.