A Computational Ethical Framework for Financial Digital Phenotyping for Mental Health
arXiv:2607.24275v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ethical governance of AI-driven systems is often expressed through high-level principles and static documentation, creating a gap between regulatory requirements and system-level verification. This challenge is particularly acute in digital phenotyping, where continuous behavioural data raises concerns around consent, privacy, and fairness. In this paper, we propose a computational ethical framework for AI-driven digital phenotyping system in whi
Record details
Published: 28 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Privacy · Healthcare
Retrieved: 28 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Auditing Fairness-Privacy Trade-offs: Subpopulation-Level Effects of Fairness-Enhancing Algorithms
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Ethical Fairness in Ubiquitous Health Sensing without Known Attributes
arXiv · 10 March 2026
Governing Healthcare AI in the Real World: How Fairness, Transparency, and Human Oversight Can Coexist: A Narrative Review
OpenAlex · 6 February 2026
Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Ethical Clinical Challenges and Pathways to Trustworthy AI
OpenAlex · 27 February 2025
AI Ethics: Integrating Transparency, Fairness, and Privacy in AI Development
OpenAlex · 7 February 2025
OPERA: Offline Policy-guided Expert Routing and Adaptation for Universal Biomedical Image Analysis
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 26 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (28 July 2026), “A Computational Ethical Framework for Financial Digital Phenotyping for Mental Health,” evidence record 13804, https://ethics.ai/record/13804 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.