Evidence record 16347 · automatically gathered

Whose ethics? Whose AI? Refining the Philippine AI Regulation Act toward a Contextual AI Ethic

The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in the Philippines has prompted the drafting of the Artificial Intelligence Regulation Act (AIRA), which incorporates internationally recognized principles, such as transparency, accountability, fairness, and risk-based classification. While these principles echo the OECD, UNESCO, and EU AI frameworks, AIRA assumes that universalist ethical safeguards can be adapted unchanged into a context marked by deep socioeconomic inequality, pervasi

Record details

Published: 4 August 2026
Source: AI & Society
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 5 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “Whose ethics? Whose AI? Refining the Philippine AI Regulation Act toward a Contextual AI Ethic,” evidence record 16347, https://ethics.ai/record/16347 (originally published by AI & Society).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.