Whose ethics? Whose AI? Refining the Philippine AI Regulation Act toward a Contextual AI Ethic
The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in the Philippines has prompted the drafting of the Artificial Intelligence Regulation Act (AIRA), which incorporates internationally recognized principles, such as transparency, accountability, fairness, and risk-based classification. While these principles echo the OECD, UNESCO, and EU AI frameworks, AIRA assumes that universalist ethical safeguards can be adapted unchanged into a context marked by deep socioeconomic inequality, pervasi
Record details
Published: 4 August 2026
Source: AI & Society
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 5 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
How Supply Chain Dependencies Complicate Bias Measurement and Accountability Attribution in AI Hiring Applications
arXiv · 24 April 2026
AIDLC–governance indicator framework: a lifecycle-based approach to institutional AI governance
AI & Society · 4 August 2026
Manipulation-Proof Oblivious Audits against Deceptive Model Providers
arXiv · 5 August 2026
Language Models as a Challenge for Business Ethics – A Partially Open-Source Approach
Science and Engineering Ethics · 14 August 2026
Financial Audit Assistance using Misinformation Detection and Explanation
arXiv · 20 July 2026
Sequential Fairness Auditing with Limited Output Access
arXiv · 29 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “Whose ethics? Whose AI? Refining the Philippine AI Regulation Act toward a Contextual AI Ethic,” evidence record 16347, https://ethics.ai/record/16347 (originally published by AI & Society).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.