Reimagining the Augmented Reality Accessibility Ecosystem for Deaf Students: Service Provider Perspectives in Experiential Learning
In experiential learning environments, Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) students often experience ``split attention,'' dividing their focus among tasks, instructors, and access providers. Augmented reality (AR) has been proposed as a means to centralize communication access within the student's field of view; however, little is known about how such systems affect the instructors, interpreters, and captioners who support access in these settings. We present a formative, expert-based evaluation of A
Record details
Published: 23 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.HC
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Environment
Retrieved: 25 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Large Language Models in Architecture Studio: A Framework for Learning Outcomes
arXiv cs.CY · 21 July 2026
Leveling the Playing Field: Temporal Video Segmentation for Individuals with ADHD in Computing Education
arXiv cs.HC · 27 July 2026
The Bartlett Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis
UCL Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation · 29 July 2026
From Scoring to Acting: Outcome-Verified Comparative Self-Distillation for LLM Agents
arXiv · 30 July 2026
Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 15 July 2026
Hypergamigication Through Integrating Game Engines and Learning Management Systems: Ender's Game
arXiv cs.HC · 31 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 July 2026), “Reimagining the Augmented Reality Accessibility Ecosystem for Deaf Students: Service Provider Perspectives in Experiential Learning,” evidence record 13480, https://ethics.ai/record/13480 (originally published by arXiv cs.HC).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.