Did Alice Do Wrong? Cross-Cultural Differences in Student Perceptions of Generative AI Use in University Computing Education
arXiv:2607.19699v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rise of generative AI (GenAI) in higher education has prompted urgent debates surrounding academic integrity and ethical use. This study examines cross-cultural differences in student perceptions of GenAI use, comparing responses from students at Canadian and South Korean universities. Using a scenario-based survey administered in Fall 2024, we analyzed how students judged the ethicality and rule compliance of AI-assisted coding practices. Resu
Record details
Published: 23 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Children & education
Retrieved: 23 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Did Alice Do Wrong? Cross-Cultural Differences in Student Perceptions of Generative AI Use in University Computing Education
arXiv · 22 July 2026
Should you use AI for a task? Here’s a simple way to decide | Bruce Schneier
The Guardian · 24 July 2026
Should You Use AI for a Task? Here’s a Simple Way to Decide
Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security · 30 July 2026
Visual Contrastive Self-Distillation
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 22 July 2026
Exploring the Design Space of LLM-Based Programming Support in CS Education: A Scoping Review through the Lens of Assistance Governance
arXiv cs.HC · 23 July 2026
Open Veins of Algorithmic Auditing: Why AI Assessment Lags Behind Its Deployment in the Global South
arXiv · 23 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 July 2026), “Did Alice Do Wrong? Cross-Cultural Differences in Student Perceptions of Generative AI Use in University Computing Education,” evidence record 12636, https://ethics.ai/record/12636 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.