Ethical and regulatory challenges of Generative AI in education: a systematic review
Introduction Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming education by enabling personalized learning and more efficient teaching practices. However, it raises critical ethical concerns, including data privacy, algorithmic bias, and educational inequality, requiring comprehensive regulatory frameworks and pedagogical strategies. Methods A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted, analyzing 53 peer-reviewed articles published between 2020 and 2024. The search was performed i
Record details
Published: 30 June 2025
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Privacy · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Ethical Clinical Challenges and Pathways to Trustworthy AI
OpenAlex · 27 February 2025
AI Ethics: Integrating Transparency, Fairness, and Privacy in AI Development
OpenAlex · 7 February 2025
Six Institutional Intervention Areas to Support Ethical and Effective Student Use of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Narrative Review
OpenAlex · 16 January 2026
Governing Healthcare AI in the Real World: How Fairness, Transparency, and Human Oversight Can Coexist: A Narrative Review
OpenAlex · 6 February 2026
Ethical Fairness in Ubiquitous Health Sensing without Known Attributes
arXiv · 10 March 2026
GIGO and the Human Processor: A Chief Humanity Officer Review
OpenAlex · 18 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (30 June 2025), “Ethical and regulatory challenges of Generative AI in education: a systematic review,” evidence record 9807, https://ethics.ai/record/9807 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.